🔗 Share this article

For a brief period, the former US president appeared to take a firm stance on the Ukrainian conflict. Following delivering threats of "significant ramifications" last August should Vladimir Putin persisted hindering ceasefire discussions, the former president eventually introduced major sanctions on the Russian biggest energy firms, Lukoil and Rosneft. This action seriously hindered Putin's capacity to fund his war effort in the region.

However, with his newly presented 28-point peace plan for Ukraine, reportedly developed by American and Russian officials excluding Ukraine's or European participation, Trump has seemingly gone back to his favorable to Russia position.

Favoring Invasion

Trump's proposal would effectively reward Putin for invading a sovereign nation while putting the country's democratic system in danger. Despite strong declarations that "The nation's sovereignty will be affirmed", significant aspects of the plan in reality weaken that same autonomy. What represents a Kremlin dream would likely be a disaster for Ukraine.

Showing his business background, Trump seems to consider the war as a basic border issue, like handing Russia a section of Ukraine's land will please the ruler. But, Russia's invasion is not merely about dominating a destroyed region of industrial-devastated territory in Ukraine's east. Instead, it's about the nation's democracy – and the Russian leader's obvious desire to destroy it so it ceases to functions as an enticing example for the Russian citizens of the responsible governance that his increasing authoritarian rule prevents them.

Land Giveaways

While maintaining in position the currently split regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, Trump's plan would require the nation to surrender the whole Donetsk region. Beyond favoring Russia with land that its forces have been unable to occupy in over a ten years of fighting, this surrender would make Ukraine's military defenses severely undermined.

The area is the place of Ukraine's much-vaunted "stronghold system", the entrenched defensive positions that are a essential impediment to Russian advances. The proposal would have Ukraine surrender these defenses, providing Putin a open route to the capital in case he later decide to renew the war.

Defense Reductions

Furthermore, in a action that would enable renewed hostilities more feasible for the Russian military, the plan would require the nation to diminish the size of its troops from their current large number troops to a limit of six hundred thousand. Importantly, the proposal sets no such restrictions on Russia's military.

In what appears as a accommodation to Russia's efforts to portray the nation's chosen by the people leadership as extremists, Trump's plan asserts: "All extremist ideology and actions must be rejected and banned." Seemingly to emphasize this aspect, it requires that "Ukraine will hold political contests in three months" of a ceasefire agreement. Meanwhile, the proposal imposes no requirement that the Russian leader endanger his authoritarian rule by allowing votes in Russia.

Defense Guarantees

To be sure, the proposal has Russia pledge not to "invade other states" and to "incorporate in regulation its stance of non-aggression towards Europe and the Ukrainian people". However considering that Putin has breached similar treaties in the past – such as the 1994 agreement, in which the Russian government committed to recognize the nation's sovereignty in exchange for surrendering its historical atomic arms, and the Minsk accords, in which Russia committed to a halt in fighting and a return of occupied territory in the Donbas to Kyiv – why should the international community believe this commitment this time?

That is why Ukraine has been so insistent on external defense commitments. While the proposal promises a "immediate unified armed reaction" if Russia resume its aggression, and states that "The nation will receive dependable defense commitments", the details range from unclear to concerning. The initiative would not only prevent Ukraine alliance membership but also prohibit member states from deploying military personnel on the nation's land, thereby blocking the reassurance force, likely commanded by the UK and France, on which Ukraine had been counting to stop Putin from replenishing his reduced troops, restocking, and attacking again.

World Reaction

An additional supplementary accord reportedly would grant the nation with a alliance-like security guarantee, in which any later "major, planned, and ongoing aggression" by the Russian Federation on Ukraine "would be considered as an assault endangering the peace and security of the allied countries." That suggests a defense action. However unlike a powerful Ukrainian military – the nation's most reliable protection against renewed invasion – the success of the parallel accord would rely on the willingness of Western powers, like the US administration, to act militarily to Russia's attacks, a response they have {not