🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, may align too neatly with the carefully constructed version promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to craft a made-to-measure version of Putin. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series released last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from disorder. Although the character's name a different name, the message is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in buttressing this identical story instead of debunking it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book aims to subvert the Putin cult by presenting him not as a cause but as a symptom, moving the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, the president is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, seeking enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. Historically, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with him to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country in practice.

• His list included several politicians, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who studied Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: obedient, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the process said the key criterion was controllability and loyalty, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the notion of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he handled paperwork and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as James Bond. The grittier version prompted Russian media and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images swapping Craig’s face with his surfaced on Moscow streets, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an star popular with Russian audiences, the authorities will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. His influence is signaled through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that could unintentionally validate the exact legends it might seek to examine.